Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
577-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

577-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.971415 50.866986)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.971372 50.866981,-0.971374 50.866990,-0.971380 50.866997,-0.971389 50.867003,-0.971401 50.867007,-0.971414 50.867009,-0.971439 50.867004,-0.971449 50.866998,-0.971455 50.866990,-0.971457 50.866982,-0.971455 50.866974,-0.971449 50.866966,-0.971440 50.866960,-0.971428 50.866956,-0.971415 50.866955,-0.971402 50.866956,-0.971390 50.866960,-0.971381 50.866965,-0.971374 50.866973,-0.971372 50.866981)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL